REGULATORY ARBITRAGE AS A TOOL FOR SHADOWING THE GLOBAL ECONOMY: IN SEARCH OF A BALANCE BETWEEN JURISDICTIONAL CONVERGENCE AND COMPETITION ON INTERNATIONAL MARKETS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2022-6-24

Keywords:

shadowization, offshorization, regulatory arbitrage, global economy, banking sector, taxes, competition, regulation, international capital flows

Abstract

The reaction of business entities to changes in the regulatory environment transforms the perception of risk as such in an unforeseen way, which, in fact, complicates the forecasting of the impact of the regulatory environment on the performance of economic agents, not only in the long term, but also in the short term. At the same time, regulatory norms that achieve their goals (financial stability, consumer protection, transparency of banking activities, growth of tax revenues to the budget, etc.) can be revised or withdrawn as soon as the conditions for the reproduction of the economic system change. It has been established that subjects and individuals falling under the new rules of interaction tend to adapt their business models and behavior in response to updated regulatory norms, which can help slow down the processes of de-shadowization of the economy in the event that there is an outflow of capital or labor resources in jurisdictions that implement strategies "races to the bottom” will have a devastating impact on the development of the national economies of countries whose governments have committed themselves to harmonizing their regulatory environment, taking into account the rules of cooperation defined at the supranational level of regulation of international economic policy.

References

Gerbrands, P., Unger, B. & Ferwerda, J. (2021), “Bilateral responsive regulation and international tax competition: An agent‐based simulation”, Regulation & Governance, vol. 16 (3), pp. 760-780.

Alm, J., Gerbrands, P. & Kirchler, E. (2020), “Using “responsive regulation” to reduce tax base erosion”, Regulation & Governance, vol. 16 (3), pp. 738-759.

Hakelberg, L. & Rixen, T. (2020), “Is Neoliberalism Still Spreading? The Impact of International Cooperation on Capital Taxation”, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 28 (6), pp. 1-27.

Hakelberg, L. (2020), The Hypocritical Hegemon: How the United States Shapes Global Rules Against Tax Evasion and Avoidance. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Crasnic, L. (2020), “Resistance in Tax and Transparency Standards: Small States' Heterogenous Responses to New Regulations”, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 29 (1), pp. 1-26.

Huynh, C.M. & Nguyen, T.L. (2019), “Shadow economy and income inequality: new empirical evidence from Asian developing countries”, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, vol. 25 (1), pp. 175-192.

Harrington, B. (2016), Capital without Borders: Wealth Managers and the One Percent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Dreher, A. & Schneider, F. (2010), “Corruption and the Shadow Economy: An Empirical Analysis”, Public Choice, vol. 144 (1), pp. 215–238.

Minto, A., Prinz, S. & Wulff, M. (2021), “A Risk Characterization of Regulatory Arbitrage in Financial Markets”, European Business Organization Law Review, vol. 22, pp. 719–752.

Cerny, Ph. (1994), “The Dynamics of Financial Globalization: Technology, Market Structure, and Policy Response”, Policy Sciences, vol. 27 (4), pp. 319-342.

Murphy, D.E. (2004), The Structure of Regulatory Competition: Corporations and Public Policies in a Global Economy. Oxford University Press, New York.

Romano, R. (1985), “Law as a Product: Some Pieces of the Incorporation Puzzle”, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, vol. 1 (2), pp. 225–283.

Tiebout, C.M. (1956), “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 64 (5), pp. 416-424.

Aslanova, E. (2021), “Regulatory competition vs regulatory cooperation: conditions of convergence of regulatory systems”, available at: http://194.44.12.92:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/5536/1/Збірник%20менеджмент%20ЗЕД-26-29.pdf

Vogel, D. (2000), “Environmental Regulation and Economic Integration”, Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 3 (2), pp. 265-279.

Donahue, J.D. (1997), “Tiebout? Or Not Tiebout? The Market Metaphor and America’s Devolution Debate”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11 (4), pp. 73-81.

Reznikova, N., Panchenko, V. & Bulatova, O. (2020), “Regulatory competition in the digital economy: new forms of protectionism”, International economic policy, no. 1-2 (32-33), pp. 50-80.

Dell’Ariccia, G. & Marquez, R. (2006), “Competition among Regulators and Credit Market Integration”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 79 (2), pp. 401-430.

Published

2022-09-29

How to Cite

Reznikova Н., Ivashchenko О., & Dvornyk І. (2022). REGULATORY ARBITRAGE AS A TOOL FOR SHADOWING THE GLOBAL ECONOMY: IN SEARCH OF A BALANCE BETWEEN JURISDICTIONAL CONVERGENCE AND COMPETITION ON INTERNATIONAL MARKETS. MODELING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, (4), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2022-6-24